Esperanza Burgos-Abril v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

61 F.3d 909 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Esperanza BURGOS-ABRIL, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70781. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1995. * Decided June 26, 1995. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, INS No. Ass-vct-bql. BIA PETITION DENIED. Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Esperanza Burgos, a native and citizen of Columbia, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision affirming the immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of her request for a waiver of deportation pursuant to section 212(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"), 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1182 (c). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1105a(a), and we deny the petition for review. 3 * Background 4 In 1978, at the age of 15, Burgos entered the United States as a lawful permanent resident. Her parents and…