Kenneth Eugene Ball v. James Williamson, Special Agent With Drug Enforcement Administration Steve Daupin, Special Agent Pat Luther, Special Agent
Opinion
Opinion
61 F.3d 909 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kenneth Eugene BALL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James WILLIAMSON, Special Agent with Drug Enforcement Administration; Steve Daupin, Special Agent; Pat Luther, Special Agent, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16900. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 17, 1995. * Decided July 20, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; No. CV-93-00905-PGR; Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding. D.Ariz. Affirmed in part, Reversed and Remanded in part. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kenneth Eugene Ball appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for the defendants, Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA") agents, in his action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and we affirm in part, and reverse…