David M. Fink v. Eddie Ylst, Warden

61 F.3d 910 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. David M. FINK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eddie YLST, Warden, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-56730. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 17, 1995. * Decided July 20, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CV-94-00590-JSL; J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. Transferred. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David M. Fink, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the magistrate judge's order denying his motion for reasonable law library access. In his underlying 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action, Fink alleges that his civil rights were violated following an incident in which a correctional officer was injured. We dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 3 The power of federal magistrate judges is limited by 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 . A district judge may authorize a magistrate judge to decide…