Kiang Goh v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

61 F.3d 910 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Kiang GOH, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 94-70682. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 17, 1995. * Decided July 20, 1995. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, No. Api-fht-zrj. B.I.A. 1 PETITION Denied. 2 Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges 3 MEMORANDUM ** 4 Kiang Nge Goh ("Goh"), a native and citizen of the People's Republic of China, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") decision affirming the Immigration Judge's ("IJ") decision denying his application for asylum pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1158 (a), withholding of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1253 (h), suspension of deportation pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1254 (a)(2), registration pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1259 (a), and adjustment of status pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1255 (a). Goh contends that the BIA…