Michael David Crill v. Ralph J. Capaul Robert H. Beck the City of Coeur D'alene, Idaho

61 F.3d 910 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Michael David CRILL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ralph J. CAPAUL; Robert H. Beck; the City of Coeur D'Alene, Idaho, Defendant-Appellees. No. 94-35395. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 6, 1995. * Decided July 13, 1995. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho, No. CV-92-00503-HLR; Harold L. Ryan, District Judge, Presiding. D. Idaho AFFIRMED 2 Before: BROWNING, WRIGHT, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges 3 MEMORANDUM ** 4 I. Deprivation of due process under the "stigma-plus" test 5 A. Theory 1 -- Liberty Interest in Occupation 6 To establish a due process violation as distinguished from a violation of state tort law, a defendant's statements must do more than make an employee less attractive to potential employers or indicate he is unable to get along with co-workers. See Hyland v. Wonder, 972 F.2d 1129, 1142 (9th Cir. 1992); Bollow v. Federal Reserve Bank of San…