In Re Guam Asbestos Litigation. Patrick J. Brennan v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation

Good Law
61 F.3d 910·1995 WL 411876·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27475
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 11, 199593-17163California286 words

Opinion

Opinion

61 F.3d 910 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In Re GUAM ASBESTOS LITIGATION. Patrick J. BRENNAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-17163. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 3, 1995. Decided July 11, 1995. Before: PREGERSON, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed. The record shows that the trial court gave an adequate instruction on legal causation in the second phase of the trial. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing Barry Castleman, who wrote a book on the subject at issue, to testify as an expert for the plaintiff. Finally, the trial court did not err in affirming the punitive damages award. The court conducted the review necessary to satisfy the requirements of due process. 3 AFFIRMED. 4 KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, dissenting. 5 Because the trial court's instructions were defective…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.