Dawson v. Lewis

61 F.3d 910 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lawrence DAWSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Theodore Jolley, Theodore Smith, Dorothy Vigil, Art Sayre, Rebecca Matthews, Yolanda Martinez, Frank Raines, Hector Campas, Elaine Branch, Walter Lasarkiewitcz, William Gaspar, Daniel Garvin, Lloyd Buckmaster, Terry Rutan, Richard Greenberg, Bernstein, and Leff, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15841. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 17, 1995. * Decided July 24, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lawrence Dawson, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's judgment for defendants, following a bench trial, on Dawson's claim that prison food was nutritionally inadequate. Dawson also appeals several pre-trial rulings. 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. A. Nutritionally Inadequate Food Claim 3 Dawson contends that the district court erred by…