Hale v. Ryan

61 F.3d 910 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Thomas HALE; Constance Malmin; Daniel Gerry, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Harold L. RYAN; A. J. Achabal; Betty Richardson; Henry Madsen; L. D. Fitzgerald, Trustee; Robert Eldridge; Teressa Zywicki; Mark Heideman; Pocatello City Police Department; Bannock County; Idaho State Journal; Lynn Winmill; Herb Carlson; James Kerns; Robert Hamlin; Idaho Supreme Court; Fred Lyon, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35800. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 17, 1995. * Decided July 20, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Thomas Hale, Constance Malmin and Daniel Geary appeal the district court's denial of their motion to file a second amended complaint and its dismissal of their amended complaint for failure to state a claim against the Idaho Supreme Court, the Idaho State Bar, federal prosecutors, judicial officers and others, alleging that the defendants…