Lexecon Inc. v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, Real Parties in Interest

61 F.3d 911 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. LEXECON INC., et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, Respondent, and Milberg Weiss Bershad Hynes & Lerach, et al., Real Parties in Interest. No. 95-70380. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 17, 1995. Decided July 21, 1995. 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus in the United States District Court, for the District of Arizona, DC No. CV-93-1087-PHX; John M. Roll, District Judge, Presiding 2 D.Ariz. 3 PETITION DENIED. 4 Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges 5 MEMORANDUM * 6 In this petition for writ of mandamus, petitioners ask this court to: (1) vacate the district court's order which permanently transferred the above-entitled case to the District of Arizona pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1404 (a); and (2) direct the district court to remand this case to the Northern District of Illinois pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1407 .…