In re Nazarowski

Good Law
61 F.3d 911·1995 WL 420762·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27496
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 17, 199592-56397California287 words

Opinion

Opinion

61 F.3d 911 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Joe NAZAROWSKI, aka Joseph Alan Nazarowski, dba Paladin Patrol, Debtor, Joe DURAN; New Paladin, Ltd., Appellants, v. Robert S. WHITMORE, in his capacity as Trustee in Bankruptcy for the Estate of Joe Nazarowski, Appellee. No. 92-56397. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted March 21, 1995. * Decided July 17, 1995. Before: SNEED, POOLE, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 On March 24, 1995, we issued an order requiring a responsive brief from the appellee and a status report on the settlement proceedings from both parties to this appeal. A copy of the order was sent to appellant's counsel, but was returned because counsel was no longer at the address provided to the court. Moreover, no forwarding address or current telephone number was available. On April 10, 1995, counsel for the appellee responded, indicating his belief that the matter had been settled and that the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.