Debra Jones, Vaughn Jones, - Cross v. County of Los Angeles, Kelly Enos, - Cross

Good Law
61 F.3d 911
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 6, 199593-56027California933 words

Opinion

Opinion

61 F.3d 911 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Debra JONES, Vaughn Jones, Plaintiffs - Appellants, Cross - Appellees, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Kelly Enos, Defendants - Appellees, Cross - Appellants. Nos. 93-56027, 93-56209, 93-56311. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 13, 1995. Decided July 25, 1995. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Sept. 6, 1995. 1 Before: LAY * , BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Debra and Vaughn Jones appeal the district court's determination of the award of attorney's fees and dismissal of their pendent state law claims. Kelly Enos and the County of Los Angeles cross-appeal. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 4 * Based on its extensive findings of fact, including the vagueness and unreliability of the time records submitted and the quality of representation afforded, 1 the district court properly reconstructed compensable hours de novo and did not abuse its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.