Torres v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. Inc.

Good Law
61 F.3d 912·1995 WL 418481·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27388
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 199594-15092California2,167 words

Opinion

Opinion

61 F.3d 912 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Andrew TORRES; Maria Torres; husband and wife; Walter Torres; Debra Torres; husband and wife, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, INC., Ohio Corp.; Goodyear Tyre & Rubber Company (Great Britain), Ltd.; Goodyear International Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants - Appellants. No. 94-15092. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 14, 1995. Decided July 13, 1995. Before: HUG, ALARCON, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 This case comes to us from the District Court of Arizona sitting in its diversity jurisdiction. Andrew and Amanda Torres, husband and wife, and Walter and Debra Torres, husband and wife, (collectively "plaintiffs"), sued Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc. ("Goodyear USA"), Goodyear Tyre & Rubber Company (Great Britain), Ltd. ("Goodyear GB"), and Goodyear International Corporation ("Goodyear International") for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.