Usman Shehu Sule v. Joseph Crabtree Robert L. Matthews, Director of Bureau of Prisons

61 F.3d 912 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Usman Shehu SULE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Joseph CRABTREE; Robert L. Matthews, Director of Bureau of Prisons, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-35832. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 17, 1995. * Decided July 20, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Usman Shehu Sule, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his action alleging unconstitutional conditions at the Federal Correctional Institution in Sheridan, Oregon ("FCI Sheridan"). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We review summary judgment de novo, Jesinger v. Nevada Fed. Credit Union, 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 1994), and affirm. 1 3 Prisoners objecting to conditions of their confinement are required to satisfy both an objective and subjective component to the challenge. Farmer v. Brennan, 114 S. Ct. 1970, 1977…