United States of America v. Gerardo Campos-Oropeza

61 F.3d 912 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. Gerardo CAMPOS-OROPEZA, Defendant - Appellant. No. 94-50595. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 14, 1995. * Decided July 18, 1995. Before: LAY ** , BRUNETTI, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 Gerardo Campos-Oropeza appeals his conviction for illegal reentry by a previously deported aggravated felon, 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (b)(1). Campos-Oropeza contends that the district court erred in denying him discovery to support his claim of selective prosecution, and in denying his motion to suppress the fruits of Campos-Oropeza's arrest. We have jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm and remand. 3 * Campos-Oropeza contends that he was forcibly detained in violation of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), because the government lacked reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot. He argues that therefore…