United States v. Mike Alfons Campa, (Two Cases)

61 F.3d 912 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mike Alfons CAMPA, Defendant-Appellant. (Two Cases) Nos. 94-50373, 94-50387. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 9, 1995. Decided July 11, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, WIGGINS, FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * OVERVIEW 2 Mike Alfons Campa appeals the district court's denial of his motion to withdraw his two guilty pleas on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel. He also appeals his sentence, arguing that the amount of intended loss used for sentencing purposes was excessive. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 . Because Campa's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are without merit, and because Campa waived the right to appeal his sentence, we affirm. BACKGROUND 3 On July 8, 1993, defendant Mike Alfons Campa pled guilty to one count of mail fraud in violation of…