James D. Parker v. George Ingle, Warden

61 F.3d 912 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James D. PARKER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. George INGLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 94-16982. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 13, 1995. * Decided July 26, 1995. Before: SNEED, CANBY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California State prisoner James Parker appeals the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 habeas corpus petition. He challenges his conviction of three counts of lewd acts on the body of a child by the use of force. He argues that the district court erred in finding that there was sufficient evidence that he used force and that the district court erred when it determined that his challenge to his consecutive state sentences was not a cognizable habeas corpus claim. We affirm. 3 1. Parker's first claim is that there was insufficient evidence that he used force when he engaged in certain of his lewd acts. What his challenge comes to is an…