United States v. Carlos Enrique Gomez-Acedo

61 F.3d 913 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Enrique GOMEZ-ACEDO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10610. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Nov. 16, 1995. Submission Deferred Nov. 18, 1994. Resubmitted July 5, 1995. * Decided July 12, 1995. 1 Before: ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges, and KING, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Carlos Enrique Gomez-Acedo appeals from his conviction after pleading guilty to one court of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. Secs. 841 and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and affirm. 4 The issue regarding compliance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c) is without merit. See United States v. Fuentes-Mendoza, No. 93-10579 slip op. (9th Cir. June 6, 1995). 5 Gomez-Acedo also raises issues regarding sentencing. We review the district court's interpretation of the Sentencing Guidelines de…