United States v. Vernon Robert Lindholm, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion
61 F.3d 913 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Vernon Robert LINDHOLM, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50428. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 14, 1995. * Decided July 21, 1995. 1 Before: FARRIS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges, and TASHIMA, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Lindholm appeals his sentence imposed on resentencing. We previously affirmed Lindholm's conviction on three counts of bankruptcy fraud, but vacated his sentence and remanded for resentencing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm. BACKGROUND 4 Lindholm was convicted on three counts of bankruptcy fraud following a bench trial. He was sentenced to 41 months imprisonment, to be followed by three years probation, and ordered to make restitution of $51,172.00. 5 In his first appeal, Lindholm argued, among other things, that the district court improperly calculated his criminal history score.…