United States v. Antonio Termayne Meeks

61 F.3d 913 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio Termayne MEEKS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10473. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 17, 1995. * Decided July 20, 1995. Before: FLETCHER, KOZINSKI and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Antonio Termayne Meeks appeals his sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines imposed following his guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance with the intent to distribute. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , 1 and we affirm. 3 Meeks contends that the district court should have awarded him a downward departure for substantial assistance to authorities because the government breached the plea agreement by failing to file a motion for a downward departure pursuant to U.S.S.G. Sec. 5K1.1. The plea agreement provided that the government would move for a downward departure if Meeks testified truthfully against his…