United States v. Jamal B., a Juvenile

61 F.3d 913 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JAMAL B., a juvenile, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-10479. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 10, 1995. * Decided July 25, 1995. 1 Before: CANBY and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Jamal Brown appeals the district court's order grant of the government's motion to transfer him for adult prosecution. See 18 U.S.C. Sec. 5032 . He also claims that his speedy trial rights were violated. We affirm in part and dismiss for lack of jurisdiction in part. 4 1. Brown first claims that the district court abused its discretion when it granted the government's motion under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 5032 to transfer him to the district court for prosecution as an adult. We find no abuse of discretion. See United States v. Alexander, 695 F.2d 398, 400 (9th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 462 U.S. 1108 , 103 S. Ct. 2458 , 77 L.…