United States v. Dennis Chan Lai and Silas Brandon

61 F.3d 913 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Dennis Chan LAI and Silas Brandon, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 92-10732, 92-10733. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 12, 1994. Decided July 26, 1995. 1 Before: POOLE and NOONAN, Circuit Judges, and MARQUEZ, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 These consolidated cases are before this court for a second time. Previously, we remanded to the district court so that it could determine preliminary factual issues concerning the admissibility of alleged drug records into evidence, specifically Exhibit 42, a computer-generated printout, and Exhibit 43, a handwritten ledger. United States v. Lai, 944 F.2d 1434, 1445 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, Brandon v. United States, 502 U.S. 1062 (1992). 4 On remand, the district court made factual findings that supported admission of the appellants' drug-trafficking records as records of regularly…