United States v. Enrique Fernandez-Pardo, AKA Miguel Del Rio Cacho Toribio Zapeda-Castro

Good Law
61 F.3d 913·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27412
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 199594-50401California283 words

Opinion

Opinion

61 F.3d 913 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Enrique FERNANDEZ-PARDO, aka Miguel Del Rio Cacho; Toribio Zapeda-Castro, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 94-50401, 94-50402. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1994. Submission Withdrawn July 17, 1995. Decided Nov. 28, 1994. Resubmitted July 19, 1995. Appeal from the United States District Court, for the Central District of California, D.C. Nos. CR-94-00146-DT, CR-94-00399-DT; Dickran M. Tevrizian, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. REMANDED. Before: GIBSON, * HUG, and POOLE, Circuit Judges. ORDER The United States appeals from the district court's dismissal of the indictments of Toribio Zapeda-Castro and Enrique Fernandez-Pardo as sanctions for failure to comply with discovery orders in response to defendants' claims that their prosecutions for being deported aliens found in the United States, 8 U.S.C. Sec. 1326 (b)(1) and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.