United States v. Marc A. Jamison
Opinion
Opinion
61 F.3d 913 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Marc A. JAMISON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 95-10009. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 10, 1995. * July 13, 1995. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Marc A. Jamison appeals his criminal conviction on one count of filing a materially false income tax return in violation of 26 U.S.C. Sec. 7206 (1). Jamison contends that the district court erred in reversing the magistrate judge's decision to grant his motion to sever defendants for trial. We affirm. I. 3 Our scope of review of a district court's denial of a motion to sever is "extremely narrow." United States v. Baker, 10 F.3d 1374, 1387 (9th Cir. 1993), cert. denied, 115 S. Ct. 330 (1994) (quoting United States v. Mariscal, 939 F.2d 884, 886 (9th Cir. 1991)). See also id. (quoting United States v. Stirling, 571 F.2d 708, 733 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S.…