United States v. Jose Antonio Pons

61 F.3d 914 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose Antonio PONS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-10558, 93-16957, 93-16796. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 16, 1995. * Decided July 6, 1995. Before: SCHROEDER, BEEZER, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 We have before us three appeals by Jose Antonio Pons, a federal prisoner, from adverse district court action in three different proceedings. We consolidate the appeals for purposes of this disposition. Post-Conviction Motions 3 In appeal No. 93-10558, Pons challenges the district court's denial of three post-conviction motions. He contends the district court erred when it denied his post-conviction motions for recusal of the prosecutor; return of property under Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e); and correction of the presentence report (PSR) under Fed.R.Crim P. 32. 4 The judgment of the district court denying the motion to recuse the…