Witte v. Lakeside Inn and Casino

61 F.3d 914 Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Arthur Paul WITTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LAKESIDE INN AND CASINO; Richard Jeha; William F. Kartoozian; Stanley W. Sperling; Sam Anderson; Michael H. Bradford, Official Capacity as Owners, Individually and in their Official Capacity as Owners, Managers and Employees of Lakeside Inn and Casino, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15379. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 16, 1995. * Decided July 25, 1995. Before: GOODWIN, SNEED and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Arthur Witte appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment to Lakeside on his claim for sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and the district court's decision not to exercise pendent jurisdiction over related state claims. I. 3 Witte settled his Title VII claim. The settlement agreement recites that he alleges that his pit boss, Jan Martinez, sexually harassed him, and caused him to be fired on…