Glasser

Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society Ltd. v. Glasser

Good Law
224 F.2d 385
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 1955No. 14325California773 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Orr, J.

Appellants issued an insurance policy to one Joe A. Svetina insuring him against liability for bodily injury sustained by any person and caused by accident in the use of an automobile covered by the policy.

On a complaint charging Svetina with injuring Kenneth Carol Glasser, son of *386 Elmer A. Glasser, by' negligently and carelessly driving and operating an automobile, the Glassers recovered a money judgment in the superior court of the state of California in and for the county of San Francisco. An execution was issued and returned unsatisfied. Later an action against appellants, as insurers, was filed by appellees in the state court and upon petition of appellants was removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. After a trial duly

The motion was denied.

In their specifications of error on this appeal the principal complaint made by appellants is that“The Court abused its discretion in refusing to grant them a new trial in order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.