United States v. Todd Morrow

Good Law
61 F.3d 914·1995 WL 424420·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 27437
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 19, 199594-50221California882 words

Opinion

Opinion

61 F.3d 914 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Todd MORROW, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50221. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 14, 1995. * Decided July 19, 1995. 1 Before: FARRIS and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges; TASHIMA ** District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Todd Morrow appeals from the 24-month custodial sentence imposed upon him pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3583 after his violation of the terms of his supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 3742 (a) and we affirm. 4 * Morrow first contends that the district court erred in considering at sentencing an amount of loss greater than that set out in his original plea agreement. Specifically, Morrow argues that in sentencing him after his violation of supervised release, the court relied upon a loss amount of $348,000 -- an amount significantly larger than the $70,000 - $120,000 to which he stipulated when he pled to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.