United States of America, Ex Rel. Murray W. Lindenthal Donald B. Willis v. General Dynamics Corporation, United States of America, Ex Rel. Murray W. Lindenthal Donald B. Willis v. General Dynamics Corporation

Good Law
40 Cont. Cas. Fed. 76,811·61 F.3d 1402·95 Daily Journal DAR 10411·32 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1342·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 20422
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 2, 199594-16005California6,721 words

Opinion

Opinion

61 F.3d 1402 32 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1342 , 40 Cont.Cas.Fed. (CCH) P 76,811, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6063 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10 ,411 UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Murray W. LINDENTHAL; Donald B. Willis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Murray W. LINDENTHAL; Donald B. Willis, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GENERAL DYNAMICS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 93-16690, 94-16005 and 93-16823. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1995. Decided Aug. 2, 1995. Murray W. Lindenthal, pro se, San Jose, CA, and Donald B. Willis, pro se, Hollister, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants-cross-appellees. Michael T. Kavanaugh, Susan A. Mitchell, Mark R. Troy and Erik F. Stidham, McKenna & Cuneo, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellee-cross-appellant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: 1 These appeals arise out of an action under the False Claims Act (FCA). 1 The relators prosecuted the action on their own after the government declined to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.