95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6218, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,622, Pens. Plan Guide P 23916w Alfred G. Cinelli, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Security Pacific Corporation Security Pacific Corporation Supplemental Group Life Insurance Plan Bank of America N.T. & S.A. And Bankamerica Corporation
Opinion
Opinion
61 F.3d 1437 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6218 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,622, Pens. Plan Guide P 23916W Alfred G. CINELLI, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECURITY PACIFIC CORPORATION; Security Pacific Corporation Supplemental Group Life Insurance Plan; Bank of America N.T. & S.A. and BankAmerica Corporation, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-17318. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 15, 1995. Decided Aug. 7, 1995. Theodore A. Kolb and William T. Kellermann, Jr., Sullivan, Roche & Johnson, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiff-appellant. Robert A. Gordon and Craig E. Stewart, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: SCHROEDER, BEEZER and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges. BEEZER, Circuit Judge: 1 In a case arising under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA"), we are called upon to determine whether the termination of an insurance policy was consistent with the terms of the plan documents. In so doing we must consider what constitutes the plan documents and whether…