Ammann

Ammann v. Home Investment Co.

Good Law
243 F.2d 748·1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4594
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 15, 1957Nos. 14587, 14632, UndocketedCalifornia6,899 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Bone, J.

I.

We have before us for disposition in the instant proceeding a motion of mov-ents Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, (hereafter referred to as “Bank”) Home Loan Bank Board, A. V. Ammann and George K. Bramley praying for an order of this Court which directs remand and dismissal of certain appeals from the. United States District Court for the Southern District of California which are now pending in this Court. We set out verbatim in the mar *750 gin the pertinent portions of the motion of the moving parties.

Parties in and to the Mallonee Litigation who are before' us opposing the granting of the motion of movents in the instant proceeding are: Long Beach Federal Savings and Loan Association; Mallonee, Fergus and Bucklin, as the Shareholders Protective Committee of Long Beach Federal Savings and Loan Association; Title Service Company, John D. Willhoit; Robert H. Wallis; *751 Home Investment Company; First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Bellflower, and their respective attorneys. Said Long Beach Federal Savings and Loan Association will sometimes be referred to herein as “Association.” All of these parties (save possibly Willhoit and the Bellflower Association)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.