Merz

Merz v. Sunnybrook Farms Milk & Ice Cream Co.

Good Law
258 F.2d 188
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 1958No. 15665California811 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Clark, J.

Appellants were distributors in Cow-litz County, Washington, of milk furnished them by Appellees who were milk processors in Portland, Oregon. After a period of dealings without a contract the parties entered into a written contract on June 23, 1954, under terms of which the Appellees would furnish Appellants with their requirements of milk, cream, milk by-products and ice cream, and Appellants would buy all of their said requirements from Appellees, who would also furnish the milk containers. The contract was for a period of three years.

A Cowlitz County ordinance required that milk contain a minimum butterfat of 3.6%. Washington state requirements were 3.25% until August, 1955, when they were raised to 8.5%.

After the date of the contract Appellants received some complaints from County milk authorities concerning low butterfat content and impurities in the milk. Appellees were so advised. Cartons in which milk was furnished to Appellants were labeled 3.8% butterfat until the supply of cartons was used in April or May, 1955.

A criminal complaint was filed against these Appellants on April 28, 1955, for selling milk with less butterfat content than required by Cowlitz County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.