Curtis

WM. A. Smith Contracting Co. v. Curtis

Good Law
259 F.2d 1·1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 4688
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 8, 1958No. 15828California893 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Denman, J.

Lookout Point Constructors, two corporations, one of Missouri and the other of California (hereafter Constructors), appeal from a judgment for damages for breach of a contract to purchase ballast material for a railway track of some sixteen miles being constructed in Oregon by Constructors. The judgment was entered by the United States District Court of Oregon in a diversity action brought by Curtis Gravel Company, a partnership of Washington State citizens (hereafter Gravel Company).

Constructors contend that there is not sufficient evidence to support the District Court’s finding that Gravel Company adequately performed its contract to supply the gravel. They contend further that the District Court erred in including certain interest charges in its judgment.

Constructors were under contract with the United States to construct the railroad and made its subcontract with Gravel Company as an independent contractor to furnish all the ballast material required, stockpiling it alongside the road and placing it on Constructors’ cars. The contract provided that Gravel Company agreed to begin stockpiling May 1, 1951 and to complete it by October 11, 1951.

Gravel Company began…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.