Koster
Koster v. Massey
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Pope, J.
Koster & Wythe commenced an action against Massey in the District Court of Guam and in connection therewith caused a writ of attachment to issue. The inter-venor, Baza, the United States Marshal, executed the writ by taking possession of certain personal property of Massey. Thereafter a verdict was returned in favor of the defendant Massey. The plaintiffs moved for a new trial. While the motion for a new trial was pending, and upon motion of the defendant, the district court discharged the attachment pursuant to a Guam statute, § 542b Guam Code of Civil Procedure (1958), which provides that an attachment shall not extend beyond one year. Thereafter plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial was granted. Marshal Baza then filed a notice of taxation of costs covering charges for storage of the attached property. The court issued an order to the plaintiffs to show cause why they should not be required to pay those charges.
A hearing was held pursuant to this order. 1 2Following the hearing, the clerk, pursuant to the court’s direction, entered in his minutes the following: “Court rules that the plaintiff is liable for the U. S. Marshal’s costs as part of the costs of the suit. Plaintiff…