Arrellano-Flores

Arrellano-Flores v. Hoy

Good Law
262 F.2d 667
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 29, 1958No. 15747California648 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chambers, J.

Arrellano-Flores is a citizen and national of the Republic of Mexico who was lawfully admitted to the United States in 1925. After administrative proceedings the district director of Immigration and Naturalization is about to deport him under 8 U.S.C.A. § 1251 (a) (11) because he has been found guilty after a California trial on a criminal charge that he unlawfully sold marihuana, a substance classified as a narcotic.

On review, the district court upheld the director. The principal issue is: Has the alien been “convicted?” This is an ingredient of the aforementioned Section 1251(a)(11). The judgment of the state court, after the finding of guilt, was that the proceedings be suspended and that probation be granted upon the condition that appellant serve one year in the county jail. Because of this rubbery end (which has the sanction of California state law and the policy of which is not our concern) to the trial, the alien says he has not been “convicted,” just found guilty. Under California law such a sentence as was prescribed here does not constitute a final judgment from which an appeal may be taken. In re Marquez, 3 Cal.2d 625 , 45 P.2d 342 .

Appellant relies heavily on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.