Everest & Jennings, Inc. v. E & J Manufacturing Co.

Good Law
263 F.2d 254·120 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 247
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 24, 1958No. 15922California4,283 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jertberg, J.

There are cross appeals before us in this case. Everest & Jennings, Inc., a corporation — defendant below and appellant and cross-appellee here — appealed from the judgment of the court below holding that E & J Manufacturing Company, a corporation — plaintiff below and appellee and cross-appellant here — was the owner of the trade-mark “E & J”; that the trade-mark was good and valid in law; and was infringed by the use of the trade-mark “E-J”. The court enjoined the defendant from further infringement, and refused to order registration of “E-J” as a trade-mark of the defendant to be applied on wheel chairs.

The district court further held that the infringement by the defendant was done without intent to infringe; that there was no contract between the parties; and that no damages should be awarded to plaintiff. From such holdings of the court below the plaintiff appealed to this Court.

We will continue to refer to E & J Manufacturing Company, a corporation, plaintiff below, as the plaintiff, and Everest & Jennings, Inc., a corporation, defendant below, as the defendant, regardless of designations on appeal.

Plaintiff E & J Manufacturing Company is a California corporation,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.