Marks

Marks v. Pinkham

Good Law
264 F.2d 460·1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4921
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 6, 1959No. 16090California3,204 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jertberg, J.

The referee in bankruptcy declared invalid as against the trustee in bankruptcy, appellee herein, chattel mortgage executed by bankrupt in favor of appellant herein. The district court confirmed the action of the referee, and the appellant, mortgagee herein, seeks reversal of the district court order.

The following, facts are not in dispute. On September 17, 1955, appellant, a resident of Multnomah County, Oregon, owned a truck and trailer physically located in said county, the certificates of title to which were registered in said State, showing appellant as the registered and legal owner. Said equipment bore license plates issued by the State of Oregon.

On or about the above date, Carl Duncan and the bankrupt, Vincent H. Duncan, purchased said equipment from appellant at Portland, Oregon. Carl Duncan was a resident,of the State of Oregon, and bankrupt was a resident of the State of Washington, residing in the City of Tacoma. As security for the unpaid balance of the purchase price, which was evidenced by joint promissory note of purchasers, the Duncans executed and delivered to appellant a chattel mortgage on said equipment, which mortgage was duly recorded in the County of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.