Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen

Good Law
268 F.2d 54·44 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2184·1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 4834
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 1959No. 16372California3,584 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hamley, J.

This action was brought by Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Company to enjoin defendant Brotherhoods from calling a strike. The district court after hearing entered a judgment dismissing the action. The court’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and supporting opinion are reported in 168 F.Supp. 911 . Plaintiff appeals.

The principal questions presented here involve aspects of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. They are: (1) Whether the controversy was a major or minor dispute under that act; (2) whether the dispute and resultant mediation proceedings had been terminated; and (3) whether during the pendency of the mediation proceedings appellant failed to preserve the status quo, as required by section 6 of the act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 156 .

Appellant operates a railroad in Montana, hauling freight as a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce. It is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Anaconda, and both corporations are managed by the same staff of officers from president down to secretary-treasurer. All major policy decisions are made for appellant by officers who are also officers of Anaconda. In making such decisions the controlling consideration is the ultimate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.