95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6114, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,474 in the Matter of the Grand Jury Subpoena Issued to David Z. Chesnoff, Esq., Las Vegas, Nevada (Two Cases). United States of America v. David Z. Chesnoff, Goodman & Chesnoff v. United States

Good Law
62 F.3d 1144
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 3, 199594-15412California1,383 words

Opinion

Opinion

62 F.3d 1144 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6114 , 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,474 In the Matter of the GRAND JURY SUBPOENA ISSUED to David Z. CHESNOFF, Esq., Las Vegas, Nevada (Two Cases). UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Z. CHESNOFF, Defendant-Appellant. GOODMAN & CHESNOFF, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. Nos. 94-15412, 94-15547. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 12, 1995 * . Decided Aug. 3, 1995. Donald M. Re, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellant Chesnoff. David Nickerson, Sausalito, CA, for appellant Goodman & Chesnoff. Michael E. Barr, Asst. U.S. Atty., Las Vegas, NV, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. Before: HALL, WIGGINS, and LEAVY, Circuit Judges. WIGGINS, Circuit Judge: OVERVIEW 1 David Z. Chesnoff and the law firm of Goodman & Chesnoff (collectively referred to as "Appellants") appeal the district court's order disqualifying them from further representation of their client and grand jury target, Richard Perry. The government argues that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal because Appellants lack standing to pursue the appeal and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.