42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1089, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6281, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10,701 United States of America v. Guy W. Olano, Jr., United States of America v. Raymond M. Gray

62 F.3d 1180 42 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1089 , 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6281, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 10 ,701 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guy W. OLANO, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond M. GRAY, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 87-3128, 88-3096 and 88-3295. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Aug. 9, 1995. Guy W. Olano, Jr., Pensacola, FL, pro se. John R. Muenster, Mestel & Muenster, Seattle, WA, William J. Genego, University of Southern California, Law Center, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellant Raymond M. Gray. Thomas C. Wales, Asst. U.S. Atty., Robert H. Westinghouse, Asst. U.S. Atty., Seattle, WA, for plaintiff-appellee. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court. Before: WRIGHT, REINHARDT, and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. Opinion by Judge O'SCANNLAIN; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT. O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: 1 The Supreme Court having decided that the presence of alternate jurors during deliberations was not erroneous, we now decide, among myriad remaining issues, whether a juror's stipulated absence from a half-day of trial testimony is permissible. 2 * Olano and Gray participated in a…