Schulein

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Schulein

Good Law
282 F.2d 267
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 6, 1960No. 16719California1,378 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Wollenberg, J.

Sears, Roebuck & Company appeals from an Order of the District Court for the Eastern District of Washington affirming an Order of the Referee in Bankruptcy preserving for the benefit of the bankrupt estate all rights of the appellant in certain conditional sales contracts upon personal property claimed as exempt by the bankrupts and ordering the bankrupts, as a condition to retaining possession of said personalty, to pay the trustee the unpaid balance as prescribed in the original contracts of conditional sale.

Charles and Betty Baldwin, the bankrupts, purchased from Sears, Roebuck & Company a sewing machine December 18, 1954, for $197.00, and a refrigerator, July 25,1955, for $211.95 under contracts of conditional sale. The contracts were not recorded in accordance with the statutes of the State of Washington, R.C.W. 63.12.010.

*269 February 21, 1957, the Baldwins filed a voluntary petition in bankruptcy and were adjudicated bankrupts February 25, 1957. At this time there was owing $231.72 on the purchase price of the above two items. In Schedule B-5 the bankrupts claimed as exempt property:

The bankrupts claimed as exempt all assets listed. Their value was less than the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.