Lundgren

Lundgren v. Freeman

Good Law
292 F.2d 489·4 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 873
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 1961No. 17232California1,208 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hamley, J.

This is a contractor’s action against an owner school district and three architects asserting claims arising out of certain contracts for the construction of school facilities. Jurisdiction in the district court rested on diversity of citizenship.

In an order filed March 21, 1957, and a judgment entered April 22, 1957, the contractor, James Lundgren, was awarded judgment against School District No. 5, Baker, Oregon, in the sum of $66,-339.71, less certain credits and costs. Unadjudicated by this ordier and this judgment were Lundgren’s claims against the school district and the architects, Claude Freeman, Sydney B. Hayslip and Stewart Tuft, for damages arising out of the alleged premature termination of the contract. Also undisposed of were Lundgren’s claims against the architects in which he sought $150,000 for damages to reputation and $50,000 punitive damages.

The school district appealed from this order and this judgment. On September 9, 1958, we dismissed the appeals on the ground that the order and the judgment were not final decisions terminating the action, but left unresolved one issue with respect to the claim. School District No. 5 v. Lundgren, 9 Cir., 259 F.2d 101…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.