Dixon v. Bonaccorso

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Daniel Steve DIXON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. S. BONACCORSO, Administrator at FSP B Facility; M. H. Tristan, Coordinator at FSP; R. Munoz, Appeals Examiner at CDC; Jack R. Reagan, Chief of Inmate Appeals for CDC, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-17226. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. * Decided Aug. 7, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Daniel Dixon, a Hawaii state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment for defendants on his Equal Protection claim, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 , alleging that prison officials discriminated against him when they denied him a job based on the length of his sentence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 We accord great deference to prison officials' decisions respecting the management of their prisons in light of their special expertise…