Banks v. Warner

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Alfred BANKS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Laura WARNER, dba Laura Warner; USD Legal Clinic, dba USD Legal Clinic; Steven Hartwell, an employee of USD Legal Clinic; David Crockett, an employee of USD Legal Clinic dba USD Legal Clinic, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-56732. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. * Decided Aug. 7, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Alfred Banks appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court's grant of summary judgment for the defendants in his action under 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1983 and 1985, and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act of 1970, 18 U.S.C. Secs. 1961-1968 . 1 We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review the denial of a Rule 60(b) motion for abuse of discretion, and will reverse "only…