Andrisani v. Sottile

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Samuel ANDRISANI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Bruce J. SOTTILE, L.A. County Superior Court Judge; EDWARD A. HINZ, JR.; JOAN D. KLEIN; H. WALTER CROSKEY; MALCOM LUCAS; STANLEY MOSK; JOYCE KENNARD; RON GEORGE; EDWARD PANELLI; ELLEN DUGGAN; RAFAEL CELEDON; BEN LAVERNE BROWN, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-55070. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. Decided Aug. 7, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Samuel Andrisani appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his civil rights action for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). In his action, Andrisani alleged that the defendants, various state court judges and justices and several parties to a prior state court proceeding, deprived him of his constitutional rights. Andrisani also sought federal review of the state court decision. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28…