James E. Bryant v. Robert Borg C.J. Johnson v. Valdez S. Larson M.F. Martel P. Kennedy and J. Bauer

62 F.3d 1423 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. James E. BRYANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BORG; C.J. Johnson; V. Valdez; S. Larson; M.F. Martel; P. Kennedy; and J. Bauer, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-15246. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. * Decided Aug. 7, 1995. 1 Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER Circuit Judges. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 California state prisoner James E. Bryant appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action against California state prison officials. In his amended complaint, Bryant alleged that the defendants failed to protect him from another prisoner and improperly revoked 360 days of prison credit. The district court dismissed Bryant's claims as barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 . We affirm in part and vacate and remand in part. 4 Bryant alleges that on February 11, 1989, he was moved from B-Facility to…