Lutz

Security-First National Bank v. Lutz

Good Law
297 F.2d 159
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 1961No. 16905California3,206 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Merrill, J.

In this diversity action brought by Appellee Lutz as plaintiff, appellants attack as unsupported by the record judgments against them for conversion, fraud and negligence.

Lutz’ complaints are centered upon the late Ben H. Sheldon of Los Angeles and his business enterprise: the manufacture of house trailers. Lutz, a resident of the State of Washington, was an investor in that enterprise. Appellant bank is the executor of Sheldon’s last will. Appellant Mae Sheldon is his widow. Appellant Hohly was his accountant. Appellant Flamingo is the corporation organized by Sheldon to receive the enterprise and is the present owner thereof. Appellant Thompson is the present sole owner of Flamingo’s capital stock.

In 1954 Lutz invested $18,000.00 in Sheldon’s venture. A partnership agreement was executed October 18, 1954, by which Sheldon and his wife became general partners with a sixty per cent interest and Lutz became a limited partner *161 with a nine per cent interest in the partnership’s earnings and assets.

Early in 1955 with the consent of Lutz as partner, the business was incorporated as the B. H. Sheldon Company, the name of the corporation subsequently being changed to that of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.