Joni Goldyn, A/K/A Joan Carver v. John Moran, and Richard Meyers Elias Ghanem

Good Law
62 F.3d 1424·1995 WL 468357·1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 29321
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 8, 199593-16664California685 words

Opinion

Opinion

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joni GOLDYN, a/k/a Joan Carver, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John MORAN, Defendant, and Richard Meyers; Elias Ghanem, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-16664. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. * Decided Aug. 8, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In this civil rights action, Joni Goldyn appeals pro se the district court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Dr. Richard Meyers and Dr. Elias Ghanem. Goldyn alleged the prison doctors were deliberately indifferent to her medical needs while she was in pretrial custody. On appeal, Goldyn contends that the district court should not have entered summary judgment without allowing her to develop evidence to support her case. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 Initially, we note that Goldyn appealed from an order that did not dispose of all of the parties in the lawsuit…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.