Gentile v. Anesthesiologists' Professional Assur. Co.

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. M. MELVIN GENTILE, D.O., LTD., an Arizona corporation; M. Melvin Gentile, D.O.; Anesthesia Associates of Arizona, an Arizona partnership; Russell Jorgensen, D.O.; Community Anesthesiologists, P.C., an Arizona corporation; Lawrence Lee, D.O.; Billie Douglas Hunt, Individually and as Guardian for and on behalf of Ivan Hunt, and for and on behalf of Pawneace Hunt, a minor, Miracles Hunt, Hosanna Hunt, a minor, Helaman Hunt, a minor, Beauty Hunt, a minor, Manti Hunt, a minor, Dickie Jo Hunt, Individually, Michalene Ray Hunt, Individually, Lane Hunt, Individually, and Shenandoah Hunt, Individually, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ANESTHESIOLOGISTS' PROFESSIONAL ASSURANCE COMPANY, a Tennessee corporation, Defendant-Appellee. No. 94-15213. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1995. Decided Aug. 2, 1995. Before: SNEED, CANBY, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Melvin…