Carl Merton Irons, II v. Daniel B. Vasquez, Warden

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Carl Merton IRONS, II, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Daniel B. VASQUEZ, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 95-15494. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. * Decided Aug. 8, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Carl Irons appeals pro se the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Irons was convicted in California state court of second degree murder. Irons contends he is entitled to habeas relief because the prosecutor introduced his confessions in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) and a videotape in which Irons re-enacted the murder. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253 and affirm. I. Miranda 3 Irons contends that he invoked his right to have counsel present during the first interview when he said, "I'll answer questions, but I, I'm afraid to volunteer information other th[a]n to answer specific questions…