Joseph E. Lane v. Samuel Lewis, Director Arizona State Prisons, Roger Crist, Harold Whitley, Capt. Carrol, Lt. Meyers, and Harry Van Dyke

62 F.3d 1424 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Joseph E. LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Samuel LEWIS, Director Arizona State Prisons, Roger Crist, Harold Whitley, Capt. Carrol, Lt. Meyers, and Harry Van Dyke, Defendants-Appellees. No. 94-16298. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted Aug. 2, 1995. * Decided Aug. 7, 1995. Before: ALARCON, FERNANDEZ, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Joseph E. Lane, an Arizona state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 and affirm. 3 Lane contends that the district court improperly dismissed his action because he had filed a timely motion for extension of time to file a second amended complaint. Lane's contention is misplaced, however, because the district court dismissed his action, in part, for failure to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss. See D. Ariz. R. 1.10(i) (failure to respond to motion…